Benchmarking methodology

How Mercor runs benchmarks to measure the frontier of intelligence.

Real-world professional work

APEX-1

Mercor

Mercor

The AI Productivity Index assesses whether frontier models can perform economically valuable tasks across four jobs: investment banking associate, management consultant, big law associate, and primary care physician.

Source
Mercor
Tasks
300
Runs
k = 4
Metric
Mean Score
Modality
Text + reference files
Task format
Single-turn
Question format
Open-ended professional deliverables
Canonical harness
Single-shot agent
Grading
Expert-authored rubrics, scored criterion by criterion
Judge
LLM judge over expert rubrics
Released
September 2025

APEX-Accounting

Mercor

Mercor

Assesses whether frontier models can produce the core deliverables of an accountant — reconciliations, financial statement preparation, audit workpapers, and tax treatment — graded against rubrics written by practising accountants.

Source
Mercor
Tasks
160
Runs
k = 4
Metric
Mean Score, Pass@1
Modality
Text + spreadsheets and filings
Task format
Single-turn
Question format
Open-ended accounting deliverables
Canonical harness
Single-shot agent
Grading
Expert-authored rubrics, scored criterion by criterion
Judge
LLM judge over expert rubrics
Released
March 2026

Evaluates models on real-world, economically valuable tasks spanning most BLS work activities for 44 occupations across nine major GDP sectors.

Source
OpenAI
Tasks
213
Runs
k = 4
Metric
Mean Score
Modality
Text + reference files
Task format
Multi-step agentic
Question format
Open-ended real-world deliverables
Canonical harness
Stirrup
Grading
LLM-as-a-judge (LMAAJ)
Judge
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
Released
October 2025

Notes

We omit seven tasks from the original dataset that require judgement of video or archive deliverables.

Harvey LAB

Harvey

Evaluates AI agents' abilities to perform real legal work across 24 practice areas, requiring agents to produce legal documents such as memos, redlines, contracts, and filings.

Source
Harvey
Tasks
1,749
Runs
k = 3
Metric
Pass@1
Modality
Text + reference files
Task format
Multi-step agentic
Question format
Open-ended legal deliverables
Canonical harness
Harvey LAB Agent
Grading
Expert-authored rubrics, scored criterion by criterion
Judge
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
Released
May 2026

Long-horizon agents and research

APEX-Agents

Mercor

Mercor

Measures whether frontier AI agents can execute long-horizon, cross-application tasks across three jobs in professional services.

Source
Mercor
Tasks
480
Runs
k = 3
Metric
Pass@1, Mean Score
Modality
Text + cross-application environment
Task format
Multi-step agentic
Question format
Long-horizon cross-application tasks
Canonical harness
Loop (truncated tools)
Grading
Expert-authored rubrics over final deliverables and agent trajectories
Judge
LLM judge over expert rubrics
Released
January 2026

Questions requiring agents to persistently navigate the internet to locate hard-to-find, entangled information. Tests information-discovery competence through persistence and creative problem-solving.

Source
OpenAI
Tasks
130
Runs
k = 4
Metric
Pass@1
Modality
Text + live web browsing
Task format
Multi-step agentic
Question format
Short free-text answer
Canonical harness
Web research agent (100 max steps, 3 hour time limit)
Grading
LLM-as-a-judge (LMAAJ)
Judge
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Released
April 2025

DeepResearch Bench II

University of Science and Technology of China

Assesses whether web-research agents can produce long-form research reports from open-ended expert briefs. Each report is evaluated for information recall, analysis, and presentation.

Source
University of Science and Technology of China
Tasks
130
Runs
k = 1
Metric
Mean Score
Modality
Text + live web browsing
Task format
Multi-step agentic
Question format
Long-form research report generation
Canonical harness
Web research agent (100 max steps)
Grading
Expert-authored rubrics, scored criterion by criterion
Judge
GPT 5.5
Released
January 2026

Coding and software engineering

APEX-SWE

Mercor

Mercor + Cognition

Measures whether frontier AI agents can execute high-value engineering work, split across observability and integration tasks. Created by Mercor in collaboration with Cognition.

Source
Mercor + Cognition
Runs
k = 3
Metric
Pass@1
Modality
Text (code repositories)
Task format
Multi-step agentic
Question format
Observability and integration engineering tasks
Canonical harness
Agentic coding harness
Grading
Expert-authored rubrics plus repository test suites
Judge
LLM judge + programmatic tests
Released
January 2026

SciCode

University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

Determines if models can write code to solve realistic scientific research problems across natural science domains like physics, chemistry, biology, and mathematics.

Source
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Tasks
65
Runs
k = 3
Metric
Mean Score
Modality
Text (scientific code)
Task format
Chained single-shot
Question format
Scientific subproblem code implementation
Canonical harness
SciCode chain agent
Grading
Programmatic unit tests for each subproblem (all must pass)
Judge
None
Released
July 2024

Terminal-Bench 2.1

Stanford; Harbor; Laude Institute

Evaluates AI agents on hard, realistic long-horizon command-line tasks: curated tasks with unique environments, human-written solutions, and verification tests.

Source
Stanford; Harbor; Laude Institute
Tasks
89
Runs
k = 3
Metric
Pass@1
Modality
Text (terminal, CLI)
Task format
Multi-step agentic
Question format
Command-line task completion
Canonical harness
Terminus 2 (1000 max steps, 3 hour time limit)
Grading
Programmatic unit tests (all must pass)
Judge
None
Released
January 2026

Notes

Instead of per-task timeouts, we impose a blanket 3 hour time limit on each task.

SWE Atlas - Codebase QnA

Scale AI

Benchmarks coding agents on codebase comprehension via under-specified, agentic Q&A tasks over real repositories, combining programmatic validation with rubric-based software-quality scoring.

Source
Scale AI
Tasks
124
Runs
k = 3
Metric
Pass@1
Modality
Text (code repositories)
Task format
Multi-step agentic
Question format
Under-specified agentic codebase Q&A
Canonical harness
mini-swe-agent (250 max steps, 1 hour time limit)
Grading
LLM-as-a-judge (LMAAJ) over software quality rubrics
Judge
Claude Opus 4.5
Released
May 2026

SWE-bench Verified

Princeton; OpenAI (Verified subset)

Tests whether models can resolve real-world GitHub issues by editing codebases, requiring multi-file, long-context changes verified by the repository’s test suite.

Source
Princeton; OpenAI (Verified subset)
Tasks
500
Runs
k = 3
Metric
Pass@1
Modality
Text (code repositories)
Task format
Multi-step agentic
Question format
Code patch resolving a GitHub issue
Canonical harness
mini-swe-agent (1000 max steps, 3 hour time limit)
Grading
Programmatic fail-to-pass and pass-to-pass unit tests (all must pass)
Judge
None
Released
October 2023

DeepSWE v1.1

Datacurve

Gauges whether models can complete realistic, long-horizon software-engineering work inside real code repositories.

Source
Datacurve
Tasks
113
Runs
k = 3
Metric
Pass@1
Modality
Text (code repositories)
Task format
Multi-step agentic
Question format
Code patch resolving a real-world repository issue
Canonical harness
mini-swe-agent (500 max steps, 2 hour time limit)
Grading
Programmatic unit tests (all must pass)
Judge
None
Released
June 2026

Notes

We evaluate only k=1 runs per task for DeepSeek-V4-Flash, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813, GLM-5.2, Kimi K2.7 Code, Kimi K3, Qwen 3.8-Max, and Qwen 3.5.

Tests whether software-engineering agents can rebuild complete programs from scratch given only a program and its documentation, matching a reference executable via end-to-end testing — from CLI tools to FFmpeg, SQLite, and PHP.

Source
Meta
Tasks
100
Runs
k = 3
Metric
Pass@1
Modality
Text (executable + documentation)
Task format
Multi-step agentic
Question format
Executable reverse engineering
Canonical harness
mini-swe-agent (1000 max steps, 6 hour time limit)
Grading
Programmatic unit tests (all must pass)
Judge
None
Released
May 2026

Notes

We equip each agent solving environment with 1 CPU and 2 GB of memory.

Knowledge and reasoning

MMLU-Pro

University of Waterloo (TIGER-Lab)

An enhanced MMLU adding harder, reasoning-focused questions and expanding choices from 4 to 10 options. MMLU evaluates general knowledge and reasoning across 57 academic and professional subjects.

Source
University of Waterloo (TIGER-Lab)
Tasks
12,032
Runs
k = 1
Metric
Pass@1
Modality
Text
Task format
Single-shot
Question format
Multiple choice (10 options)
Canonical harness
Single-shot agent
Grading
Programmatic multiple-choice answer extraction
Judge
None
Released
June 2024

GPQA Diamond

New York University

Graduate-level, “Google-proof” multiple-choice science questions written by domain experts; the Diamond split is the hardest, expert-validated subset.

Source
New York University
Tasks
198
Runs
k = 4
Metric
Pass@1
Modality
Text
Task format
Single-shot
Question format
Multiple choice (4 options)
Canonical harness
Single-shot agent
Grading
Programmatic multiple-choice answer extraction
Judge
None
Released
November 2023

AIME 2025

Mathematical Association of America

Competition-mathematics problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination, each with an integer answer; measures advanced multi-step mathematical reasoning.

Source
Mathematical Association of America
Tasks
30
Runs
k = 4
Metric
Pass@1
Modality
Text
Task format
Single-shot
Question format
Integer answer (0–999)
Canonical harness
Single-shot agent
Grading
LLM-as-a-judge (LMAAJ)
Judge
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Released
2025

HLE

Scale AI + Center for AI Safety

Frontier, multi-disciplinary academic knowledge and reasoning on closed-ended questions requiring genuine subject mastery rather than retrieval.

Source
Scale AI + Center for AI Safety
Tasks
2,158
Runs
k = 3
Metric
Pass@1
Modality
Text + multimodal
Task format
Single-shot
Question format
Exact-match short answer (~76%); multiple choice, 5+ options (~24%)
Canonical harness
Single-shot multimodal
Grading
LLM-as-a-judge (LMAAJ)
Judge
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Released
January 2025

Notes

We omit 342 tasks from the original dataset that require multimodal capabilities.

SUPERChem

Peking University

Challenges models to solve expert-curated chemistry problems, with tasks ranging from synthesis and structural analysis to experimental interpretation and physical-chemistry calculations.

Source
Peking University
Tasks
500
Runs
k = 3
Metric
Pass@1
Modality
Text + multimodal
Task format
Single-shot
Question format
Multiple choice (up to 26 options)
Canonical harness
Single-shot multimodal
Grading
Programmatic multiple-choice answer extraction
Judge
None
Released
December 2025

Multimodal understanding

MMMU-Pro

Carnegie Mellon University

A more robust multimodal benchmark that filters text-only-solvable questions, expands answer options, and adds vision-only inputs (text embedded in images) to test true joint visual and textual reasoning.

Source
Carnegie Mellon University
Tasks
1,730
Runs
k = 3
Metric
Pass@1
Modality
Multimodal (image required)
Task format
Single-shot
Question format
Multiple choice (up to 10 options)
Canonical harness
Single-shot multimodal
Grading
Programmatic multiple-choice answer extraction
Judge
None
Released
September 2024

CharXiv

Princeton University

Evaluates multimodal models on realistic chart understanding using hand-curated arXiv charts, with descriptive questions on basic elements and reasoning questions that synthesize across complex elements.

Source
Princeton University
Tasks
5,000
Runs
k = 3
Metric
Pass@1
Modality
Multimodal (charts, figures)
Task format
Single-shot
Question format
Short answer (descriptive + reasoning questions on charts)
Canonical harness
Single-shot multimodal
Grading
LLM-as-a-judge (LMAAJ)
Judge
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Released
June 2024

MedXpertQA MM

Tsinghua University; Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory

Assesses medical reasoning on multimodal multiple-choice questions that require models to interpret clinical images and patient descriptions across 11 body systems.

Source
Tsinghua University; Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
Tasks
200
Runs
k = 3
Metric
Pass@1
Modality
Multimodal (image required)
Task format
Single-shot
Question format
Multiple choice (5 options)
Canonical harness
Single-shot multimodal
Grading
Programmatic multiple-choice answer extraction
Judge
None
Released
January 2025

Notes

We replace the benchmark paper's Zero-shot-CoT approach with a combined single-shot prompt that includes both the paper's CoT and answer extraction trigger sentences.

Instruction following and long context

Long Context Reasoning (AA-LCR)

Artificial Analysis

Long Context Reasoning: 100 hard questions over 234 documents in 30 sets that require synthesizing information across multiple documents and complex reasoning rather than simple retrieval.

Source
Artificial Analysis
Tasks
100
Runs
k = 4
Metric
Pass@1
Modality
Text (~100k tokens per question)
Task format
Single-shot
Question format
Short free-text answer over multi-document sets
Canonical harness
Single-shot agent
Grading
LLM-as-a-judge (LMAAJ)
Judge
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Released
August 2025

Evaluates complex, multi-turn, and system-level instruction following via expert-curated rubrics over 1,600+ prompts.

Source
Meta
Tasks
1,645
Runs
k = 4
Metric
Pass@1
Modality
Text
Task format
Single-shot
Question format
Open-ended prompts graded against expert-written rubrics
Canonical harness
Single-shot agent
Grading
LLM-as-a-judge (LMAAJ) over expert-written rubric criteria
Judge
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Released
November 2025

Every benchmark is run at maximum reasoning effort across all models. Repeats are aggregated into a single pass@1 figure rather than reported as a best-of score.

APEX NEWSLETTER

The latest on frontier AI performance, straight to your inbox.

New benchmarks, leaderboard shifts, and research from the APEX team.

By subscribing you agree to receive updates from Mercor.
Unsubscribe anytime.