Benchmarking methodology

How Mercor runs benchmarks to measure the frontier of intelligence.

Real-world professional work

APEX-1

Mercor

Mercor

The AI Productivity Index assesses whether frontier models can perform economically valuable tasks across four jobs: investment banking associate, management consultant, big law associate, and primary care physician.

Source
Mercor
Tasks
300
Runs
k = 4
Metric
Mean Score
Modality
Text + reference files
Task format
Single-turn
Question format
Open-ended professional deliverables
Canonical harness
Single-shot agent
Grading
Expert-authored rubrics, scored criterion by criterion
Judge
LLM judge over expert rubrics
Released
September 2025

APEX-Accounting

Mercor

Mercor

Assesses whether frontier models can produce the core deliverables of an accountant — reconciliations, financial statement preparation, audit workpapers, and tax treatment — graded against rubrics written by practising accountants.

Source
Mercor
Tasks
160
Runs
k = 4
Metric
Mean Score, Pass@1, Pass@8, Pass^8
Modality
Text + spreadsheets and filings
Task format
Single-turn
Question format
Open-ended accounting deliverables
Canonical harness
Single-shot agent
Grading
Expert-authored rubrics, scored criterion by criterion
Judge
LLM judge over expert rubrics
Released
March 2026

Long-horizon agents and research

APEX-Agents

Mercor

Mercor

Measures whether frontier AI agents can execute long-horizon, cross-application tasks across three jobs in professional services.

Source
Mercor
Tasks
480
Runs
k = 3
Metric
Mean Score, Pass@1
Modality
Text + cross-application environment
Task format
Multi-step agentic
Question format
Long-horizon cross-application tasks
Canonical harness
Loop (truncated tools)
Grading
Expert-authored rubrics over final deliverables and agent trajectories
Judge
LLM judge over expert rubrics
Released
January 2026

Questions requiring agents to persistently navigate the internet to locate hard-to-find, entangled information. Tests information-discovery competence through persistence and creative problem-solving.

Source
OpenAI
Tasks
130
Runs
k = 4
Metric
Pass@1
Modality
Text + live web browsing
Task format
Multi-step agentic
Question format
Short free-text answer
Canonical harness
Web research agent (max_steps = 100, 3-hour timeout)
Grading
LLM-as-a-judge (LMAAJ)
Judge
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Released
April 2025

Coding and software engineering

APEX-SWE

Mercor

Mercor + Cognition

Measures whether frontier AI agents can execute high-value engineering work, split across observability and integration tasks. Created by Mercor in collaboration with Cognition.

Source
Mercor + Cognition
Runs
k = 3
Metric
Pass@1
Modality
Text (code repositories)
Task format
Multi-step agentic
Question format
Observability and integration engineering tasks
Canonical harness
Agentic coding harness
Grading
Expert-authored rubrics plus repository test suites
Judge
LLM judge + programmatic tests
Released
January 2026

Terminal-Bench 2.1

Harbor

Evaluates AI agents on hard, realistic long-horizon command-line tasks: curated tasks with unique environments, human-written solutions, and verification tests.

Source
Harbor
Tasks
89
Runs
k = 3
Metric
Pass@1
Modality
Text (terminal, CLI)
Task format
Multi-step agentic
Question format
Command-line task completion, verified by tests
Canonical harness
Lighthouse Harbor (Terminus)
Grading
Every verification test must pass — no LLM judge
Judge
None — programmatic unit tests
Released
January 2026

SWE Atlas - Codebase QnA

Scale

Benchmarks coding agents on codebase comprehension via under-specified, agentic Q&A tasks over real repositories, combining programmatic validation with rubric-based software-quality scoring.

Source
Scale
Tasks
124
Runs
k = 3
Metric
Pass@1
Modality
Text (code repositories)
Task format
Multi-step agentic
Question format
Under-specified agentic codebase Q&A
Canonical harness
host-mini-se
Grading
Programmatic validation plus rubric-based software-quality scoring
Judge
claude-opus-4.5
Released
May 2026

SWE-bench Verified

Princeton; OpenAI (Verified subset)

Tests whether models can resolve real-world GitHub issues by editing codebases, requiring multi-file, long-context changes verified by the repository’s test suite.

Source
Princeton; OpenAI (Verified subset)
Tasks
500
Runs
k = 3
Metric
Pass@1
Modality
Text (code repositories)
Task format
Multi-step agentic
Question format
Code patch resolving a GitHub issue, verified by tests
Canonical harness
Lighthouse Inspect
Grading
Fail-to-pass and pass-to-pass tests must pass — no LLM judge
Judge
None — programmatic unit tests
Released
October 2023

Knowledge and reasoning

MMLU-Pro

University of Waterloo (TIGER-Lab)

An enhanced MMLU adding harder, reasoning-focused questions and expanding choices from 4 to 10 options. MMLU evaluates general knowledge and reasoning across 57 academic and professional subjects.

Source
University of Waterloo (TIGER-Lab)
Tasks
12,032
Runs
k = 1
Metric
Pass@1
Modality
Text
Task format
Single-shot
Question format
Multiple choice (10 options)
Canonical harness
Single-shot agent
Grading
LLM-as-a-judge (LMAAJ)
Judge
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Released
June 2024

GPQA Diamond

New York University

Graduate-level, “Google-proof” multiple-choice science questions written by domain experts; the Diamond split is the hardest, expert-validated subset.

Source
New York University
Tasks
198
Runs
k = 4
Metric
Pass@1
Modality
Text
Task format
Single-shot
Question format
Multiple choice (4 options)
Canonical harness
Single-shot agent
Grading
LLM-as-a-judge (LMAAJ)
Judge
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Released
November 2023

AIME 2025

Mathematical Association of America

Competition-mathematics problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination, each with an integer answer; measures advanced multi-step mathematical reasoning.

Source
Mathematical Association of America
Tasks
30
Runs
k = 4
Metric
Pass@1
Modality
Text
Task format
Single-shot
Question format
Integer answer (0–999)
Canonical harness
Single-shot agent
Grading
LLM-as-a-judge (LMAAJ)
Judge
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Released
2025

Instruction following and long context

Long Context Reasoning (AA-LCR)

Artificial Analysis

Long Context Reasoning: 100 hard questions over 234 documents in 30 sets that require synthesizing information across multiple documents and complex reasoning rather than simple retrieval.

Source
Artificial Analysis
Tasks
100
Runs
k = 4
Metric
Pass@1
Modality
Text (~100k tokens per question)
Task format
Single-shot
Question format
Short free-text answer over multi-document sets
Canonical harness
Single-shot agent
Grading
LLM-as-a-judge (LMAAJ)
Judge
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Released
August 2025

Evaluates complex, multi-turn, and system-level instruction following via expert-curated rubrics over 1,600+ prompts.

Source
Meta
Tasks
1,645
Runs
k = 4
Metric
Pass@1
Modality
Text
Task format
Single-shot
Question format
Open-ended prompts graded against expert-written rubrics
Canonical harness
Single-shot agent
Grading
LLM-as-a-judge (LMAAJ) over expert-written rubric criteria
Judge
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Released
November 2025

Every benchmark is run at maximum reasoning effort across all models. Repeats are aggregated into a single pass@1 figure rather than reported as a best-of score.

APEX NEWSLETTER

The latest on frontier AI performance, straight to your inbox.

New benchmarks, leaderboard shifts, and research from the APEX team.

By subscribing you agree to receive updates from Mercor.
Unsubscribe anytime.