Engineers and researchers build on what their field already knows, and their work has to hold up on cases they never saw. OpenWorldEngineer tests AI agents the same way, on ultra long-horizon problems.
We built OpenWorldEngineer to evaluate whether agents can make substantial contributions to full engineering projects. Every task requires significant work beyond the best public methods: agents must adapt existing work, solve the remaining challenges, and turn their decisions into measurable improvements.
Scores reflect how far an agent advances the project toward a defined objective. Each attempt is rescaled so the untouched baseline scores 0% and the task's ceiling scores 100%, so both incremental gains and major breakthroughs count. Final evaluation runs on held-out cases the agent never sees.
There are 26 tasks across 4 domains: science, software, ML, and engineering. Every task is built by a domain expert with a master's or PhD in their field, 10+ years of experience, or both. The benchmark is open source.
Mean@8 averages each task's attempts, then the tasks, with a 95% interval across tasks. Best@8 averages each task's best attempt. Elo rates the models head to head on every task, with the task baseline anchored at 1000.
View more
Fable 5.2
40.2%
GPT-6 Astra
39.4%
Opus 5.5
30.4%
View more
Fable 5.2
62.2%
Opus 5.5
49.7%
GPT-6 Astra
44.3%
View more
Fable 5.2
54.6%
Sonnet 5.5
47.8%
Opus 5.5
42.6%
View more
Fable 5.2
59.6%
GPT-6 Astra
57.3%
GPT-6.1 Sol
54.4%